articole
Diferențe
Aici sunt prezentate diferențele dintre versiunile selectate și versiunea curentă a paginii.
| Ambele părți revizuirea anterioarăVersiuni anterioare | |||
| articole [16.01.2021 11:44] – ranghel | articole [16.01.2021 11:45] (curent) – ranghel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linia 18: | Linia 18: | ||
| [[https:// | [[https:// | ||
| - | Abstract : Like all EU Institutions and citizens, the Court of Justice of the European Union has been deeply affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Hearings have been cancelled, deliberations have been postponed and, since 13th March 2020, a teleworking regime has been set up in order to prevent the risk of further contamination by the virus. Despite these measures, the Court of Justice has managed to deal with a significant number of cases and to deliver several important judgments during the health crisis. The present article examines how that result was achieved, through the adoption of measures relating to both the written and oral parts of the procedure, as well as the way in which deliberations of the EU Court have been organised. | + | **Abstract :** Like all EU Institutions and citizens, the Court of Justice of the European Union has been deeply affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Hearings have been cancelled, deliberations have been postponed and, since 13th March 2020, a teleworking regime has been set up in order to prevent the risk of further contamination by the virus. Despite these measures, the Court of Justice has managed to deal with a significant number of cases and to deliver several important judgments during the health crisis. The present article examines how that result was achieved, through the adoption of measures relating to both the written and oral parts of the procedure, as well as the way in which deliberations of the EU Court have been organised. |
| -------- | -------- | ||
| Linia 45: | Linia 45: | ||
| Articol integral publicat în Revista EuRoQuod nr.1/2019: [[https:// | Articol integral publicat în Revista EuRoQuod nr.1/2019: [[https:// | ||
| - | Rezumat: | + | **Rezumat:** |
| În România, dispoziţiile naţionale de transpunere a Deciziei-cadru 2008/ | În România, dispoziţiile naţionale de transpunere a Deciziei-cadru 2008/ | ||
| privind aplicarea principiului recunoașterii reciproce în cazul hotărârilor judecătorești | privind aplicarea principiului recunoașterii reciproce în cazul hotărârilor judecătorești | ||
| Linia 54: | Linia 54: | ||
| conforme, şi ţinând cont şi de jurisprudenţa CJUE în interpretarea aceleiaşi Decizii-Cadru. | conforme, şi ţinând cont şi de jurisprudenţa CJUE în interpretarea aceleiaşi Decizii-Cadru. | ||
| - | Absttract: | + | **Absttract:** |
| In Romania, the national provisions transposing EU Framework Decision 2008/909 / JHA | In Romania, the national provisions transposing EU Framework Decision 2008/909 / JHA | ||
| on the application of the principle of mutual recognition in the case of judgments | on the application of the principle of mutual recognition in the case of judgments | ||
articole.1610797497.txt.gz · Ultima modificare: 16.01.2021 11:44 de către ranghel